Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mees Rottgering vs Amir Omarkhanov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rottgering vs Omarkhanov analysis and find out who is favored!
Mees Rottgering vs Amir Omarkhanov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rottgering 0 - 0 Omarkhanov
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rottgering has won 47.83% of points on their second serve, while Omarkhanov has won 46.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rottgering, in recent form, has won 55.04% of their opponent's second serve points, while Omarkhanov has won 48.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.7% and 24.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rottgering has saved 64.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Omarkhanov has saved 37.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rottgering has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 16/ 12), with Omarkhanov winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rottgering has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Omarkhanov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Rottgering has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12), where as Omarkhanov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rottgering has played against opponents with an average rank of 56.21 while Omarkhanov has played against players with an average rank of 9.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rottgering has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Omarkhanov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rottgering has converted 47.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Omarkhanov has converted 66.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
893
Rank
886
High
16
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
57% (17-13)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-2)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mees Rottgering vs Amir Omarkhanov For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rottgering VS Omarkhanov
Sportsbook
Offer
Rottgering VS Omarkhanov H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mees Rottgering | Amir Omarkhanov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (122/115) | 27% (9/24) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:49 | 1:17:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 97 | 9.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (476/798) | 56% (52/93) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (319/476) | 44% (23/52) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (154/322) | 46% (19/41) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (36/76) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (293/734) | 32% (29/91) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Mees Rottgering Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Michael Agwi
Player
Mees Rottgering
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Unknown Player
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Mees Rottgering
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Mees Rottgering
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
19
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
57 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
10 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Mees Rottgering
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
David Perez Sanz
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Mees Rottgering
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Patrick Zahraj
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Amir Omarkhanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
49
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Amir Omarkhanov
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 0-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Rottgering Vs Omarkhanov Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rottgering are available here and Omarkhanov photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
